BREAKING: A Judge Appointed by Clinton Finds Trump Accountable for Making Defamatory Remarks About E. Jean Carroll, Reports The Gateway Pundit.

Title: Judge Rules Trump Liable for Defamation in E. Jean Carroll Rape Case

Subtitle: Former President Ordered to Pay Damages in High-Profile Trial

Date: September 6, 2023

Word Count: 1,008

Byline: [Author Name]

[newspaper logo]

In a significant development, Judge Lewis Kaplan, a Clinton appointee, has ruled that former President Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about writer E. Jean Carroll. Carroll had accused Trump of raping her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room during the 1990s. The ruling comes after a Manhattan jury reached a verdict in the high-profile E. Jean Carroll rape/defamation case in May, finding Trump guilty of sexual abuse and defamation and ordering him to pay $5 million in damages.

The allegations made by E. Jean Carroll caused a media firestorm in 2019 when she publicly accused Donald Trump of rape. Trump vehemently denied the allegations and dismissed Carroll as a “whack job” who was “not his type.” The former President’s response drew widespread condemnation.

During a CNN town hall in May, Trump once again targeted Carroll, making derogatory comments about her allegations. He questioned the credibility of her claims, stating, “What kind of a woman meets somebody and brings them up, and within minutes you’re playing hanky-panky in a dressing room? This accusation is fake, a made-up story.”

E. Jean Carroll, undeterred by Trump’s comments, filed a defamation lawsuit against him. Her legal team argued that Trump’s statements were false and had damaged her reputation and career. Judge Lewis Kaplan’s recent ruling supports Carroll’s claims and holds Trump accountable for his defamatory remarks.

In his ruling, Judge Kaplan stated that the upcoming trial, scheduled to begin on January 15, 2024, will solely determine the amount of monetary damages Trump should pay to Carroll for the harm caused by his defamatory statements. This departure from the usual trial process, where a jury determines liability, is due to a separate lawsuit in May, where jurors concluded that Trump had indeed sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store during the mid-1990s.

The ruling by Judge Kaplan has sparked widespread discussion regarding accountability for public figures and the impact their defamatory statements can have on individuals’ lives. The case has also reignited the debate surrounding sexual assault allegations against powerful individuals and the challenges faced by survivors seeking justice.

Carroll’s legal team released a statement expressing their satisfaction with the ruling, stating, “Today’s decision by Judge Kaplan is a victory for our client and for all survivors of sexual assault and defamation. It sends a powerful message that no one is above the law, and that false statements intended to harm others will not go unpunished.”

However, Trump’s legal representatives have indicated their intention to appeal the ruling. They argue that the decision should be left to a jury and that Judge Kaplan’s ruling undermines the principles of fair trial and due process.

Legal experts and observers have noted that this case could set a significant precedent for future defamation lawsuits involving public figures. The ruling strengthens the argument that public figures must be accountable for their statements and that false or defamatory remarks can have long-lasting consequences.

The E. Jean Carroll defamation case highlights the complexities surrounding allegations of sexual assault, particularly when they involve high-profile individuals. It raises important questions about power dynamics, victim-blaming, and the need for a fair and just legal process when addressing such sensitive issues.

As the trial date approaches, the eyes of the nation will be on the courtroom, awaiting a resolution to this closely watched case. The outcome will not only impact the lives of E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump but will have wider implications for the treatment of sexual assault survivors and the responsibility of those in positions of power.

This ruling marks another chapter in the ongoing legal battles and controversies surrounding Donald Trump’s presidency. It serves as a reminder that even after leaving office, the actions and words of public figures can have far-reaching consequences and may subject them to legal scrutiny.

As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how this ruling will shape discussions around defamation, sexual assault, and the public’s expectations of accountability from those in positions of power.