Caution Issued: ‘Biden has Unleashed Chaos’ | The Gateway Pundit

President Biden is being accused of opening the floodgates to a potential global war as international conflicts continue to escalate. According to expert Gordon Chang, the current state of affairs leads him to believe that the merging of existing conflicts around the world could result in the next global war. This warning comes as tensions in several regions have intensified and the involvement of major world powers such as China and Russia raises concerns about potential widespread warfare.

Specifically, Chang points to a statement made by National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on CNN, where he acknowledges the challenges posed by the growing conflicts in various parts of the world. This includes the involvement of multiple countries and terrorist groups in the conflicts, prompting concerns of a regional conflict expanding into a larger, global-scale war.

The situation in the Red Sea, for example, has been linked to events in Gaza, as mentioned by Sullivan. However, Chang notes that the conflict has already extended beyond Gaza, with Hamas leaders seeking refuge in various countries, including Morocco and Algeria. Additionally, the involvement of Iran in attacks against Israel further complicates the situation, as tensions rise across multiple continents.

Jonathan Bass, of InfraGlobal Partners, has described the current state of affairs as one where “blood now soaks the soil of three continents” and aggressors are on “killing sprees.” The combination of ongoing conflicts in various regions has raised concerns about the potential for widespread violence on a global scale, with implications for international peace and security.

According to Chang, Biden’s policies are failing because his approach to foreign relations is based on the belief that it is possible to integrate all nations into the rules-based international system. However, major world powers such as China and Russia do not adhere to the same principles of sovereignty and international cooperation. This fundamental difference in ideology and approach to global affairs has implications for the effectiveness of Biden’s foreign policy initiatives.

The ongoing crisis in Ukraine, coupled with China and Russia’s involvement in fueling insurgencies in North Africa, adds to the complexity of the situation. With Iran’s attacks on Israel from Gaza and the Golan Heights, the potential for widespread conflict involving multiple parties is a significant cause for concern.

Chang’s analysis points to the fact that China and Russia do not adhere to the same international norms and principles that have defined the post-World War II era. As a result, the efforts to integrate these nations into the international system are met with resistance and challenges, posing a threat to global stability and security.

Furthermore, Biden’s attempts to engage with China and manage the Russia-Ukraine conflict are met with significant obstacles, as both countries have conflicting interests and agendas that do not align with the United States’ goals. The pursuit of compromise in the Middle East is also complicated by these geopolitical tensions, making it difficult to achieve meaningful progress in resolving ongoing conflicts.

In summary, the warning sounded by Chang serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of allowing regional conflicts to escalate and overlap, leading to a larger, global conflict. The implications of such a scenario are dire, with significant impacts on international peace and security. As tensions continue to rise in various regions, the need for diplomatic and strategic intervention to prevent further escalation becomes increasingly urgent. The future of global peace and stability hinges on the ability of world leaders and international actors to address these challenges and prevent the outbreak of a widespread global conflict.