&w=707&quality=100)
Jordan Henderson, a long-time supporter of LGBT+ rights, has recently moved to Saudi Arabia, a country known for its lack of recognition and legality of LGBT+ rights. This move has sparked criticism from Liverpool-backed fan group Kop Outs, who feel that Henderson has “sided with the oppressor” and compromised his legacy at Liverpool.
Henderson, who spent 12 successful years at Liverpool, joined Al Ettifaq in the Saudi Pro League, where he is set to earn a significant weekly salary. However, the Saudi regime has faced condemnation from various organizations and governments for its human rights violations, including the illegality of homosexuality.
The Liverpool midfielder had been actively involved in promoting LGBT+ awareness, supporting the Premier League’s rainbow laces campaign, and using his platform to advocate for equality. This has left Kop Outs and Liverpool fans questioning the authenticity of Henderson’s allyship, given his decision to move to a country with such restrictive views on LGBT+ rights.
Paul Amann, the founder of Kop Outs, expressed his disappointment in Henderson’s move, stating, “Twelve years at Liverpool and he appeared to embody the values of the city and the club. He would speak out against the abuse of women, advocate for women’s participation in sports and society, support food bank programs, the NHS, and most importantly, LGBT+ rights. Yet he’s going to a country where much of that would not be allowed.”
Amann believes that while Henderson’s legacy as a player remains intact due to his achievements and success at Liverpool, his personal image has been tarnished by aligning himself with a country that suppresses human rights. Amann suggested that Henderson had other opportunities to continue playing, and he could have remained a celebrated figure among Liverpool fans. Instead, the decision to move to Saudi Arabia has left many questioning the genuineness of his allyship towards LGBT+ rights.
In conclusion, Henderson’s move to Saudi Arabia has triggered debates surrounding his commitment to LGBT+ rights advocacy. Critics argue that his decision contradicts the values he appeared to uphold during his time at Liverpool, leading to concerns about the authenticity of his previous allyship efforts.
