Is it fact or fiction that Oklahoma will finish in the top five for the 2025 class?

Recruiting Analysts Debate Future of College Football Programs

Rivals national recruiting analyst Marshall Levenson, along with Parker Thune of OUInsider.com, Landyn Rosow of AggieYell.com, and Jefferson Powell of DeathValleyInsider.com, recently engaged in a discussion to determine the validity of various statements related to college football recruiting.

Thune began the conversation by stating that he believes it is fiction that Oklahoma will secure a top-five recruiting class for the 2025 cycle. While the Sooners have garnered 15 commits thus far, Thune doubts their ability to land elite prospects like Ty Haywood or Michael Fasusi. He acknowledges that Oklahoma has a shot at safety Jonah Williams, but anticipates a prolonged recruitment battle. Thune predicts that the Sooners will likely finish between the 6th and 10th spot nationally, emphasizing that Brent Venables and his staff prioritize quality recruits over chasing a top-ranked class for the sake of hype.

Levenson concurred with Thune’s assessment, expressing skepticism about Oklahoma’s chances of landing top-tier talents to elevate their recruiting class. He pointed out that programs like Texas A&M, Alabama, Oregon, and Texas are trending with five-star prospects, posing a significant challenge to the Sooners. Levenson speculated that Oklahoma would likely finish between the 6th and 12th position, contingent on their performance during the season.

In a deviation from Thune and Levenson’s opinions, Rosow argued that Connor Weigman, the quarterback for Texas A&M, is poised for a standout season. Despite Weigman’s injury struggles in previous years, Rosow believes that if the quarterback remains healthy, he will excel during the upcoming season. However, Levenson raised doubts about Weigman’s durability, citing concerns about his ability to withstand a full season in a new offensive system. He suggested that backup quarterbacks Jaylen Henderson and Marcel Reed could potentially see playing time if Weigman falters.

Moving on to a discussion led by Powell, the analysts analyzed LSU head coach Brian Kelly’s recent comments about Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals. Powell contended that Kelly’s statements were misconstrued, emphasizing that LSU’s approach to recruiting does not involve outright financial compensation to secure commitments. Levenson echoed Powell’s sentiments, noting that while Kelly’s remarks may have stirred controversy, LSU’s recruiting prowess and prestigious legacy will continue to attract top-tier talent, regardless of any perceived restrictions on NIL deals.

Ultimately, the analysts agreed that Kelly’s comments would not significantly impact LSU’s recruiting efforts in the long run. They highlighted the program’s longstanding success in recruiting top talent and predicted that LSU would remain a formidable presence in the college football landscape.

The debate among the recruiting analysts provided valuable insight into the evolving dynamics of college football recruiting and the strategic considerations that programs must navigate to secure top prospects. As the recruiting cycle progresses, it will be interesting to see how these projections unfold and whether the analysts’ assessments align with the eventual outcomes.

.
.
.
.
.