“RINO Sen. Lankford’s Proposed Senate Border Bill Allows Entry of 5,000 Illegal Aliens Daily, totaling 1.8 Million Annually” – The Gateway Pundit

Senate Leaders Release Comprehensive Border Security Bill

After months of negotiations, Senators James Lankford (R-OK), Krysten Sinema (I-AZ), and Chris Murphy (D-CT) have released the details of a long-awaited comprehensive border security bill. The bill, totaling $118.28 billion, also allocates a substantial amount to foreign aid, sparking a debate over the Senate’s priorities, reported by The Gateway Pundit.

The 370-page deal, as per Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, claims it reflects weeks of good-faith negotiations, balancing domestic concerns with urgent international aid needs. According to Senator Murray, the bill includes a variety of funding for foreign aid, including $60.06 billion to support Ukraine, $14.1 billion for Israel, and $10 billion in humanitarian assistance, among many other allocations.

However, concerns have been raised over the funding allocation for U.S. border security, which is earmarked at $20.23 billion. This has led to debate over the Senate’s priorities at a time when domestic border security challenges persist.

Senator James Lankford (R-OK) issued a statement expressing the urgent need to secure the U.S. border. He emphasized that the immigration hearings are backlogged for years, allowing millions of non-citizens to wander around the country. Lankford highlighted that the US has had the highest number of illegal border crossings every month in the last four months, and this constitutes a crisis that cannot wait any longer.

The proposed bill aims to grant the Secretary of Homeland Security unprecedented emergency powers to manage extraordinary migration events at the U.S. border. This new “border emergency authority” is specifically designed to respond to surges in migration that overwhelm existing border security and immigration processing capabilities. The legislation sets clear thresholds for the activation of this emergency authority, ensuring clarity and specific conditions for its use.

In addition, the bill includes provisions for a new work authorization process for aliens who cross the border illegally, emphasizing the need for elevated credible fear screenings and asylum bars to obtain work authorization. It also allows for an inadmissibility bar on aliens who have been removed two or more times pursuant to the border emergency authority.

The bipartisan border policy changes negotiated by Senators Chris Murphy (D-CT), Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), and James Lankford (R-OK), as included in the bill, aim to address the existing operational needs and expand capabilities at the nation’s borders. The bill also includes funding to build the wall, increase technology at the border, and add more detention beds, agents, and deportation flights. It also seeks to eliminate the abuse of parole on the southwest border, modify the asylum laws, and provide new emergency authorities to respond to illegal crossings.

The bill also includes funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program, an important provision to help nonprofits and places of worship make security enhancements. The proposed bill provides detailed steps and guidelines for the use of the border emergency authority, clearly outlining the activation thresholds and the subsequent actions to be taken.

Overall, the release of the comprehensive border security bill has sparked debates and discussions over the allocation of funds, the prioritization of domestic and foreign aid, and the urgent need to address the ongoing crisis at the U.S. southern border. The various provisions and changes proposed in the bill have drawn attention to the stringent measures and emergency powers that would be granted to manage the border security challenges.

The release of this bill has been met with a mix of reactions, with some emphasizing the need for swift action to secure the border and improve the country’s immigration system, while others raise concerns over the allocation of foreign aid versus domestic security needs. As the bill makes its way through the legislative process, further discussions and debates are expected to shape the final outcome and impact of the proposed measures.