Title: House Judiciary Committee Reveals Collusion Between FBI and Ukrainian Security Service in Online Censorship Scheme
Introduction:
In a recent development, GOP lawmakers have released documents exposing a shocking revelation – the collusion between the FBI and the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) in a concerted effort to censor American citizens online. The House Judiciary Committee raised concerns over the SBU’s historical ties to Russia, the KGB, and the FSB, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation into this unconstitutional behavior by the FBI. Through routine exchanges of spreadsheets containing thousands of flagged accounts, American social media platforms were coerced into removing targeted content. This report sheds light on the worrisome extent of the FBI’s involvement and questions the credibility and competence of the nation’s premier law enforcement organization.
Background:
The SBU, as the successor organization to the Soviet-era KGB, inherited its original staff, structure, and modus operandi from its predecessor. The newly independent Ukrainian government established the SBU after the collapse of the Soviet Union. These historical ties with Russian-aligned forces raise concerns about the integrity and impartiality of the SBU’s activities. These concerns have been further amplified by evidence of their collaboration with the FBI, creating a disturbing scenario where American citizens’ freedom of speech is compromised.
Coordination between FBI, SBU, and American Social Media Platforms:
The House Judiciary Committee revealed that the FBI regularly collaborated with the SBU in flagging social media accounts for removal. The collusive efforts primarily targeted Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and Meta (formerly known as Facebook) among other platforms. Authentic American accounts, including a verified U.S. State Department account and those belonging to American journalists, were wrongly flagged for deletion. This collaborative endeavor between the FBI, SBU, and social media companies raises serious concerns about the FBI’s role, the credibility of the SBU, and the trustworthiness of American social media platforms.
Examples of Censored American Accounts:
One striking example shared by the House Judiciary Committee involves Meta receiving massive spreadsheets from the FBI and SBU, containing thousands of accounts to be removed. Among these accounts, a subset belonged to United States residents. These American accounts were labeled with either “США” or “USA” in Cyrillic script. Some notable examples included a photographer working with a studio in New York, a manager of a moving company in South Carolina, a musician and vocalist based in Minnesota, a professor at a university in California, and a children’s book author living in Washington state. These individuals, innocently posting on social media platforms, found themselves at the center of this disturbing censorship campaign.
FBI Offering Legal Cover to Meta for Content Removal:
The FBI’s collusion reached an even more alarming level when it offered Meta legal protection for removing the accounts flagged by the SBU. This collaboration between law enforcement agencies and social media platforms undermines the principles of free speech, infringing upon the rights of American citizens. Moreover, the report highlighted the SBU’s involvement in requesting the removal of a verified U.S. State Department account and an American journalist, further casting doubt on the legitimacy and credibility of the collaboration.
Challenging the Biden Regime’s Censorship:
The Biden administration is presently dealing with a censorship case in federal court, where The Gateway Pundit, a prominent news organization, is the lead plaintiff. In response to the government’s pervasive collaboration with Big Tech to manipulate public opinion and censor speech on multiple topics, a Trump-appointed federal judge issued a preliminary injunction. This injunction restrains the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the FBI, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other agencies from participating in this government-wide, fascist conspiracy. The specific instances of censorship include the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, the Covid lab-leak theory, and the effectiveness of Covid vaccines, among others. Notably, tech giants Google, Facebook, and Twitter are named in the lawsuit, highlighting their complicity in this infringement on free speech.
Conclusion:
The revelation of collusion between the FBI and the SBU in an online censorship scheme targeting American citizens raises serious concerns about the integrity and trustworthiness of these institutions. The House Judiciary Committee has shed light on the unconstitutional behavior exhibited by the FBI and the questionable credibility of the SBU. With ongoing investigations into the extent of the FBI’s involvement, it is crucial to safeguard the principles of free speech and protect the rights of American citizens. The case against the Biden administration, as brought forth by The Gateway Pundit, serves as a critical step toward countering the erosion of online freedoms and upholding the values of democracy.
Source
