Tucker Carlson: 2024 Election Cycle Will Be Fraught Like ‘They Killed Kennedy’
Opinion
The former Fox News host Tucker Carlson offered up some grim analysis of what the 2024 presidential election cycle might bring, noting that every power center in America is trying to stop Donald Trump from winning “like when they killed Kennedy.”
It’s a sobering take from the media giant, asserting that Democrats, Republicans, the media, and intelligence agencies, along with numerous other entities, are working in concert to stop the man who stands as the overall favorite amongst voters.
“You have Trump … all the liberal polls are showing him leading the race, beating Joe Biden in the battleground states,” Carlson said in a podcast interview with Redacted News host Clayton Morris.
“So like, they can’t let him win, but if they don’t let him win, then it’s just super obvious that all this democracy stuff was fraudulent and that it’s not a democracy, it’s an oligarchy run by the richest people,” he continued.
The United States in 2024, Carlson contends, “is an oligarchy run by the richest people.” It is an analysis that is grim, disturbing, and likely true, and worthy of delving deeper by political analysts, experts, and journalists.
Carlson believes that one man trying to lift the veil on this was Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) “back when he was a free man … telling the truth.”
The former Fox News host then pivoted to a frightening outlook and analysis of what is happening right before our eyes.
RELATED: Tucker Carlson: Nixon Was Removed from Office Because He Knew CIA Was Involved in Kennedy Assassination
Carlson: They’ll Do Anything To Stop Trump ‘Like When They Killed Kennedy’
Carlson, in the interview with Morris, was asked what his political instincts were telling him was going to happen in 2024. He began by pointing out that “every power center in the country” was working together to stop Trump.
Every power center, and now that this is becoming obvious, he contends, the truth is being revealed.
“And so at that point, like the veil’s off, we can’t pretend anymore,” Carlson said. “Like when they killed Kennedy – which they did – they could kind of pretend like everything’s fine.”
“But after this election, there’s no pretending, everything’s fine. Everyone will know,” he continued. “And it is a little bit like you get kidnapped, you get thrown in the back of the car, and all of a sudden the kidnapper turns around and lowers his mask, and you see his face. And that’s not a good thing because once you see his face, he has to kill you because you know who he is.”
This is a fervent, if not radical, viewpoint that echoes conspiracy theories of the past. But even if one were to dismiss it, it’s certainly deserving of a closer examination.
America’s kidnapper has been revealed in the form of a power-hungry, elitist cabal, desperately trying to stop a man of the people.
RELATED: Robert F Kennedy Slams Biden Administration For Failing to Release All JFK Assassination Files: ‘What Are They Hiding?’
Did They Kill Kennedy?
Carlson has long been a believer that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was involved in the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
In fact, he recently offered a detailed analysis of why he believes President Richard Nixon was removed from office (Watergate) because he specifically knew that the CIA was involved in Kennedy’s assassination and was asking too many questions.
“On June 23, 1972, Nixon met with the then–CIA director, Richard Helms, at the White House,” Carlson explained. “During the conversation, which thankfully was tape-recorded, Nixon suggested he knew ‘who shot John,’ meaning President John F. Kennedy.”
“Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy’s assassination, which we now know it was,” he added. “Helms’s telling response? Total silence.”
Four of the five burglars in the Watergate scandal worked for the CIA.
Ron Paul, the former Republican presidential candidate, and libertarian icon, like Carlson, has asserted that Kennedy was “murdered by our government.”
Carlson also told Redacted News that if the entrenched deep state were actually trying to preserve democracy, they’d leave the 2024 presidential contest up to the voters.
“I kind of don’t know how we get along after this election unless they decelerate and, and just, and just do what they should do,” he said. “Which is like, look, we don’t like Trump. Here’s why we don’t think he’s good for the country. Here’s why we think Joe Biden’s great. Here’s why America make your choice.”
“But I don’t think they are going to do that. They’re morally obligated to do that, but they won’t. And it’s incumbent on them to do that,” Carlson continued. “Stop charging him with bulls*** crimes that your own people skate on.”
Tucker believes that the only way to move on in this country is to “have a free and fair election for the first time in a while, since 2016.”
This indicates a fundamental issue with the core of democracy and the entrenched powers in both parties.
Libertarians and liberals should be working alike toward ensuring a fair portion of power is distributed and the will of the people, according to the vote, is returned.
If Carlson is accurate, America is heading for a constitutional crisis. At the very least, Carlson’s assessment asserts a nonpartisan analysis of the corruption that is embedded in our system of governance. It represents, at its heart, a valid warning about the failure of established institutions to adhere to the democratic process, without resorting to extreme rhetoric.
It is a prediction of a troubled 2024 and rights remaining up for grabs. Just as Carlson’s summary of being allied to explicit critical trust in institutions, he pinpoints an endemic problem of corruption, collusion, and viciousness at the center of American politics. For Carlson, no matter your thoughts on his leanings or outspokenness, it is a profound wake-up call about the necessity to return to legal means of resolving disputes and asserting political opinions.
Thus, the implications are vast. Whether there is truth to Carlson’s view or not, it is necessary to ponder whether the same scenarios as Nixon-era politics are unfolding in the modern era. Such a comparison is worrying, and we would all do well to consider it thoughtfully if we wish to see a United States that leads as a beacon of democracy in 2024.
Would love to know your thoughts in the comments section.
icon-facebook icon-twitter icon-youtube icon-instagram icon-linkedin
Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”
Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox News, Breitbart, and many more.
By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from ThePoliticalInsider.com and that you’ve read and agree to our Privacy policy and terms and conditions.
© 2021 | The Political Insider
In conclusion, Carlson’s analysis has sparked debate, and potential concerns, among analysts, experts, and political commentators. It’s a scenario that could readily be based on conspiracy alone, or a window into a darker hidden reality. As much as one might be inclined to dismiss such a notion purely as conspiracy, the alarm raised by Carlson is certainly hard to ignore. And herein, lies the potential value of Carlson’s view; to present a conversation that is difficult and troubling, and may very well change our understanding of recent history and shape the route of the 2024 presidential elections. The suggestion that a historic figure like Carlson is asking questions so openly has the potential to mobilize the people and upend the electoral landscape. The conversation could well be starting point for a serious and profound debate on the future of American democracy, how the mainstream media should cover it, and the role every citizen ought to play in shaping our nation’s path moving forward.